Various Suppressors

Congress wades into Solvent Trap Issue

Michael Crites

Share

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on email

Disclosure: Products are selected by our editors. We may earn a commission on purchases from a link. How we select gear.

Earlier this month, the ATF rejected 847 pending Form 1s– the paperwork needed to legally “make” a registered NFA item such as a suppressor, SBR, or SBS.

The reason for the heartbreak is that the applicants had listed that they intended to use some sort of solvent trap to create a legal suppressor. Provided you don’t live in a state where suppressors are illegal (there are only eight of them ) and you are legally able to possess a firearm, nothing is barring the self-manufacture of “silencers” for personal use.

Going past the 847 rejections, ATF also notified 3,000 other applicants with pending Form 1s for making suppressors that they had to supply additional information and details about the material and construction process used in making these items.

Keep in mind that possession of what the regulator considers “suppressor parts” without a signed and approved Form 1 is illegal and can result in 10 years in federal prison. Google the Fifth Amendment on this one.

To fire back on ATF’s new anti-suppressor-making spree, about half of Congress– you know which half– have written letters to the agency in the past week demanding answers by the end of the month.

4.6/5 - (33 votes)

Checking our work.

We use years of experience, deep research, and hands-on testing to scrutinize our product recommendations and provide you with as close to objectively accurate results we humans can muster. If you’ve found different results in your own testing, think we missed something important, or otherwise need to adjust our work, please let us know. If it’s noteworthy we’ll consider integrating your feedback into our article. After all, it takes a village. 

Email the editor

Read more gun & gear reviews: